Litter impacts social and environmental values

Condition - Litter

Litter is consistently rated by the community as one of the biggest threats to waterways. Litter detracts from the community enjoyment of waterways. The presence of litter creates a perception that a place is not cared for by people.  People associate litter with poor stream health and perceive waterways with no visible litter as healthy waterways.

Values impacted by litter 

Amenity, recreation and community connection

Key value - Amenity Key value - Recreation Key value - Community connection

The presence of litter impacts on the amenity of waterways, which in turn impacts the sense of community connection and the enjoyment gained through recreation along waterways. 

Litter trap
Litter is difficult to remove from waterways and is best reduced by prevention

Platypus

Key value - Platypus

Litter such as fishing line and hairbands poses a risk to platypus due to the possibility of entanglement which can lead to platypus drowning.  

There is not a strong relationship between the presence of litter and the health of other environmental value such as fish and frogs in waterways. This is due to the litter in waterways often being relatively inert.  Litter is a more significant problem for the environmental values when it reaches and settles in the bays.

Rubber bands, fishing line and other forms of litter can cause serious injury to platypus.
Rubber bands, fishing line and other forms of litter can cause serious injury to platypus.

 

Litter is measured based on observations

Litter is based on observation, with many organisations and community groups coordinating litter collections and assessment. Standardised reporting on litter to support the collaborative sharing and use of the data is evolving.

Litter baseline and targets

2018 baseline: measured using the Clean Communities Assessment Tool (CCAT), and generalisation drawn from the data. The CCAT provides a systematic assessment of littering behaviour, litter and key features of public places.  

2068 target: assumes that places where scores are currently assessed as ‘high’ (meaning prevalence of litter is low) have potential to maintain or improve the score to very high through increased investment in litter prevention initiatives.

Without additional effort to change urban drainage design and littering behaviour, it is projected that litter in waterways will increase as urban population increases. Where scores are currently assessed as high and there is likely to be significant urban growth, the current trajectory is for them to degrade to moderate. 

Number of waterways in each catchment by litter absence score

 
Scoring categories:   Very low   Low   Moderate   High   Very high   Not applicable
 

Hover, click or tap (on mobile) the charts below to view more information.

 

Actions to improve litter 

Litter is managed through behaviour change programs such as education and enforcement and through physical mechanisms such as street sweeping, litter traps and litter collection.

The strategy includes actions to reduce littering through raising community awareness and knowledge; development of infrastructure and use of enforcement; and ongoing improvement in the assessment of litter volumes and sources to inform prioritisation of these programs. 

See regional performance objectives RPO-26 and RPO-27 in the Report Card for the litter related objectives of the Strategy.

Case study: Litter Trackers - Understanding litter transport in Melbourne’s waterways

Case study: Litter Trackers - Understanding litter transport in Melbourne’s waterways

Litter is a significant problem in waterways and most of the sources of litter arise from our suburban streets. Litter tracking studies using plastic bottles with small GPS tracking devices inside collected data to show how far and how quickly litter travels through drains and waterways to the sea.

Read the whole case study